Post Reply - WAR

   So the outcome of Saudi talks between US and UKraine is US will send weapons/intel (and volunteers ?) again...
DJ, Other western/NATO countries started to blame trump for the ongoing UKraine military collapse...(they may NOT mention it; the NATO expansion idea into UKraine, Georgia was a US idea...Europe was against it !) 

The trump-team "plans"for tariffs on trade with a.o. Canada also "turned back"...to avoid Canadian tariffs on electricity exported to the US...

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Whiplash_(medicine) or https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Whiplash_(medicine) "whiplash policies" may be a "nice" word for trump his insanity...

In Paris a "coalition of the willing" -including Canada, Japan, South Korea, Australia-however without the US- is discussing on "plans for UKraine"...

The major outcome of trumps his jumps is western instability, break-up...If trumpf wants to fight Iran he may need allies...
----
On the battlefield Russia is pushing UKraine/NATO forces out of Kursk...Western "bla-bla" on a cease fire is NOT serious. UKraine is close to collapse-the western "cease fire" is meant only to restart the war on a stronger UKraine basis...

So...Russia may be going for the Dnjepr-river and control over Eastern UKraine...in talks it will demand also Odessa...

The west-"based on UKraine intel"-still going for Russia is close to collapse...The over 300 UKraine drones fired on Moscow-prior to the Saudi UKraine-US talks show more despiration then strength or wisdom...Attacking civilian infrastructure is an act of terrorism..

Russia is attacking civilian infrastructure used for military goals; railways, electricity (electric trains), gas storage (energy) ports/depots (logistics). 

So for UKraine Russia is going for collapsing UKraine/regime change...Demilitarizing UKraine, keeping it out of NATO...

Part of "talks" with the "west" may see Russia demanding the "not 1 inch east" deal from 1990/1991...NATO pulling back to the 1990 borders...BRICS+ may support that demand. 