PANDEMIC ALERT LEVEL
123456
Forum Home Forum Home > Mpox Discussion Forum: > Latest News > Post Reply
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Mpox Discussion Forum: Latest News & Information Regarding the Clade 1b Mpox Virus

Post Reply - On M-pox


Post Reply
Name:




Message:

Emoticons
Smile Tongue Wink
Cry Big smile LOL
Dead Embarrassed Confused
Clap Angry Ouch
Star Shocked Sleepy
more...
   Enable BBcodes
Security Code:
Code Image - Please contact webmaster if you have problems seeing this image code  Refresh Refresh Image
Please enter the Security Code exactly as shown in image format.
Cookies must be enabled on your web browser.

Message
Topic - On M-pox
Posted: 03 Jul 2024 at 7:47am By Dutch Josh
....One runs risks if one jumps from one bedpartner to another...Not only for Mpox but lots of (Sexually Transmitted) Diseases...

Good info is supposed to stop the high risk behavior...somehow it not always sticks...

M-pox may spread via contact, infected fluids on doorknobs, watertaps...Some indications out of DRC to possible aerosol spread ??? (The number of schoolchildren infected is high in certain regions). 

https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lanmic/article/PIIS2666-5247(23)00059-9/fulltext or https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lanmic/article/PIIS2666-5247(23)00059-9/fulltext ;
The mode of transmission for human monkeypox virus (MPXV) has thus far been considered to be direct physical contact with lesions or the fluids contained within them during intimate contact. However, ongoing outbreaks since 2022 have triggered new debates regarding roles of other possible transmission modes of MPXV, such as the airborne route.
-
Bruno Hernaez and colleagues reported that in their study of 44 patients with symptomatic mpox at two health centres in Spain, high loads of MPXV DNA were identified in 35 (85%) of 41 saliva samples and that infectious MPXV was recovered from 22 (67%) of 33 saliva samples positive for MPXV DNA. The reported maximum viral load in saliva samples of patients reached approximately 1×10 copies of viral genome per mL, and the minimum size of respiratory particles carrying the virus in those viral load conditions was calculated to be more than 25 μm, by use of aerosol dynamics theories and the reported viral load (appendix).   
Hugh Adler and colleagues reported on the viral loads (denoted by Ct values) of MPXV identified in the upper respiratory tracts of seven patients in the UK. The viral loads of the patients, based on these Ct values, were estimated to be less than 106 copies per mL.  The minimum size of respiratory particles carrying MPXV virions was estimated to be more than 100 μm using aerosol dynamics theories and the aforementioned viral loads.    
If respiratory particles (ie, particles emitted from respiratory tracts) are larger than the cutoff size between aerosols and droplets, they are categorised as droplets (ie, large earthbound respiratory particles), whereas if they are smaller than the cutoff size, they are catagorised as aerosol particles (ie, tiny airborne particles; appendix). The cutoff size between aerosols and droplets is highly dependent on the surrounding airflow conditions, including relative humidity and airflow velocity. The standard cutoff size between aerosols and droplets, which has been under debate in aerosol dynamics, ranges between 5 μm and 100 μm.  

DJ...droplets are "heavy" so 6 feet-2 meter distance of a patient offers "a lot of protection" (however contact of infected surfaces is a risk !) Aerosol spread is a higher risk...masks/eyeprotection needed !

Forum Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 12.07
Copyright ©2001-2024 Web Wiz Ltd.

This page was generated in 0.063 seconds.